BM @ MY LNABusiness @ MY LNAEnvironment @ My LNAHighlightsMy LNA EnglishOpinion @ My LNA

The hidden costs of greenwashing on brand equity


By: Dr. Abdul Rahman Zahari

Companies are under increasing pressure to showcase their commitment to sustainability in an era where environmental consciousness is ingrained in consumer values. However, as the demand for eco-friendly products and services rises, so does the prevalence of greenwashing—an alarming practice where companies mislead consumers with exaggerated or false claims of environmental friendliness. This article delves into the profound impact of greenwashing on both customer perception and financial-based brand equity.

Dr. Abdul Rahman Zahari

Greenwashing poses a significant threat to the relationship between consumers and brands. When companies engage in misleading environmental claims, they betray customer trust and compromise the genuine efforts of businesses striving to make a positive impact. The allure of greenwashing may seem advantageous in the short term, but the long-term consequences on brand equity are substantial.

Impact on customer-based brand equity

Greenwashing strikes at the heart of customer-based brand equity by eroding trust, a fundamental pillar between consumers and brands. When consumers uncover deceitful eco-friendly claims, it breeds disillusionment and a profound sense of betrayal. This erosion of trust doesn’t just affect a particular product; it extends its negative impact across the entire brand, significantly diminishing customer loyalty.

Furthermore, the fallout from greenwashing tarnishes a brand’s image. As consumers become more discerning, they remember being misled. This lingering negative perception damages a brand’s image, leaving enduring effects on future purchasing decisions and the overall reputation of the company.

The repercussions of greenwashing extend to lost market opportunities. Studies, like those conducted by Nielsen, reveal a global trend where an increasing number of consumers—particularly 73% of millennials—are conscientiously seeking authentic and eco-friendly brands. Brands indulging in greenwashing risk losing out on these valuable market opportunities, as customers gravitate toward competitors that demonstrate transparent and credible sustainability practices.

The advent of social media exacerbates the impact of greenwashing. Negative experiences are swiftly shared across online platforms, leading to widespread backlash that can swiftly damage a brand’s reputation among a broad audience. Companies facing such situations need prompt action to address concerns and mitigate the potential damage to their brand equity.

Moreover, greenwashing has the potential to spur customer activism. Disillusioned consumers might actively campaign against deceptive practices, employing various means such as online movements, petitions, or even boycotts. Brands caught in the web of greenwashing may find themselves under public scrutiny, risking reputational harm and financial losses.

Impact on financial-based brand equity

Beyond its impact on customer trust, greenwashing exposes brands to legal repercussions. Regulatory bodies are increasingly vigilant against false environmental claims, and companies found guilty of greenwashing face fines and legal actions. Such legal battles can have severe financial implications, affecting a brand’s bottom line and long-term financial health.

Market value decline is another consequence. Financial markets respond not only to consumer sentiment but also to ethical business practices. Brands caught greenwashing might experience a decline in market value as investors react to the erosion of customer trust and potential legal issues. This decline can have lasting financial implications for the brand’s stability.

Additionally, genuine sustainability efforts by committed companies may suffer due to competition from greenwashing counterparts. This competitive disadvantage leads to an inefficient allocation of resources, as consumer skepticism towards sustainability initiatives makes it challenging for truly eco-conscious brands to receive the necessary financial support.

Finally, the fallout from greenwashing can trigger consumer boycotts, directly impacting a brand’s revenue stream. Vocal consumers disappointed by deceitful practices might redirect their spending to brands with authentic sustainability initiatives, causing financial harm to the brand engaged in greenwashing.

The impact of greenwashing extends far beyond the immediate deception of consumers. It undermines the core values of trust and integrity that form the basis of customer-based brand equity. Simultaneously, the financial-based brand equity of companies engaged in greenwashing is at risk, with potential legal repercussions and declines in market value. In a world where consumers demand authenticity and accountability, companies must recognize the long-term consequences of greenwashing and prioritize genuine sustainability efforts to build and maintain a resilient brand.


The author is a Senior Lecturer at the UNITEN Business School, Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), and he may be reached at

Leave a comment

Please Login to Comment.


Related Articles


CHARM terima RM80,000 daripada KBS

KUALA LUMPUR, 18 April 2024 – Menteri Belia dan Sukan, Hannah Yeoh...


Dua kertas pertimbangan dibentang dalam mesyuarat JKPS

PUTRAJAYA, 18 April 2024 – Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Dato’ Seri Dr. Ahmad...

BM @ MY LNAIsu Semasa @ My LNAPolitik @ My LNA

BERSIH mahu perbicaraan pengampunan Najib dibuat secara terbuka

KUALA LUMPUR, 18 April 2024 – Susulan keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi yang membenarkan...